| Peer-Reviewed

Socio-Eco-efficiency Indictors Effect on Water Consumption and Recycling Efficiency in Kombolecha, Ethiopia

Received: 28 July 2019     Accepted: 25 December 2019     Published: 9 January 2020
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Ethiopia is amongst agrarian economy but drought affected and rainfall dependent country in eastern Africa. Water consumption growth and green environmental problems were increasing parallel to factories production growth and population density rise in Kombolecha city. Consumers were used water resources for different purposes to attain their optimal social, economic and environmental aspects. However, consumer’s economic, social, and environmental indicators were disintegrated in the course of water consumption and recycling process. This study intended to determine the effect of socio-coefficient indicators on water consumption and recycling efficiency in Kombolecha. In doing so, this study employed instrumental variable model and two stages least square estimation that could be integrated the consumer’s social, economic and environmental indicators and built a socio-eco efficiency framework, which maintain water consumption and recycling efficiency in drought affected cities. In addition to this, propensity score matching estimation was used to evaluate the impacts of consumer’s poverty and consumption behaviours effect on water consumption and recycling efficiency. Accordingly, this study investigated that consumer’s water consumption behaviours were found different and varied across their production and consumption purposes in Kombolecha. For instance, factories were used different quantities of water along with their type of production. It was also computed that consumer’s social, economic and environmental aspects were associated with their water consumption and recycling processes. However, household’s consumption behavior and poverty level was negatively associated and affected the water consumption and recycling efficiency at the 5 percent significance level. In this study, nonetheless, rather than each separate indicator, the socio- eco efficiency framework, which consisted the three key indicators, were positively and statistically significant and influenced consumer’s water consumption and recycling efficiency in meeting green environment resilience. This study, thus, recommends that environment protection offices should be tactically integrated consumer’s social, economic and environmental indicators to build socio- eco efficiency that recover the green environment Kombolecha and at large in Ethiopia.

Published in International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12
Page(s) 7-19
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Socio-Eco Efficiency, Recycling, Water Consumption, Indicators, Framework

References
[1] FAO, 2007&2011: Interdepartmental Working Group on Climate Change: Climate Change and Food Security. A Framework for Action. Rome: Italy.
[2] GTP, 2010 & UNEP, 2011: Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication: A Synthesis for PolicyMakers.Www.Unep.Org/Greeneconomy.
[3] Kombolcha Municipality office, 2012: Kombolecha city municipality Annual Report, unpublished, Kombolecha. Ethiopia.
[4] Kombolcha City industry office, 2013: Kombolecha city Trade and industry office. Investment report, unpublished, Kombolecha, Ethiopia.
[5] Guy R 20105: Economic, Environmental and Social Sustainability Indicators: Research and Development Aiding Triple Bottom Line Sustainability in Cotton Industry. Australian. Www.Cottoncrc.Org.
[6] WBCSD, 1996: Eco Efficiency and Cleaner Production: Charting the Course to Sustainability. Geneva: Switzerland.
[7] ESCAP, 2009, Bruce et al., 2010) and Lorenzo, 2013, and ESCAP 2009: Eco-Efficiency Indicators: Measuring Resource-Use Efficiency and the Impact of Economic Activities on UNEP. Bangkok 10200: Thailand. Www.Unescap.Org/Esd.
[8] Sailing, et al. (2013): How to measure social impacts? A socio-eco efficiency analysis by SEEBALANCE Method. Karlsruhe university, Jena university and Oko-institute. Germany.
[9] WBCSD (1996), ESCAP (2009)9: WBCSD 1996: Eco Efficiency And Cleaner Production: Charting the Course to Sustainability. Geneva: Switzerland.
[10] Kuznets, 1955: Kuznets S 1955: Growth and Economic Inequality. American Economic Review, 45: 1, 1-28. USA.
[11] Gujarati D 1995 &2004: Basic Econometrics, Third Edition. New York: Mcgraw-Hill.
[12] McDonagh&Ramlogan, 1997 and Chen, 2010: Mcdonagh P & Prothero A 1997: Green Management: A Reader. London: Dryden Press.
[13] Tracey and Anne, 2008: Tracey S & Anne B 2008: Sustainable Development: Linking Economy, Society, and Environment. OECD. Web: Www.Oecd.Org/Publishing/Corrigenda.
[14] Uno S 2011: Urban Development And The Environmental Challenges “Green” Systems Considerations: Issue Paper Commissioned By The European Commission. The Stockholm Resilience Center: Stockholm University.
[15] Abigail, 2012: “Building Urban Resilience: Principles, Tools and Practice.” The Worldbank Group 1818 H Street: NW Washington. DC, 20433: USA.
[16] UNEP, 2011: Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication: A Synthesis for Policy Makers. Accessed: Www.Unep.Org/Greeneconomy.
[17] Smith, 2013: Smith EE 2013: Assessing The Impact Of Greening Perceptions On Consumer Purchasing Behavior: International Journal Of Economics And Management Sciences Vol. 2: No. 11: Pp. 94-107. Department Of Business Management: Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University: South Africa.
[18] Elkington, 2004: Elkington J 2004: Enter The Triple Bottom Line. In.: Henriques, A.; Richardson, J. The Triple Bottom Line: Does It All Add Up? London: Earth Scan.
[19] Anna, 200620.
[20] Freeman (1984), Beckenstein (1996) and Elkington (2004): Beckenstein A 1996: Stakeholder Negotiations: Exercises In Sustainable Development. IRWIN. P. 2.
[21] Rainer, 2005 & 2006): Rainer G 2006: Feasibility Study: Integration of Social Aspects into LCA.
[22] WBCSD, 1996, ESCAP, 2008& UNIDO, 2009: Background Paper On The 4th Forum On The Seoul Initiative Network On Green Growth: “Promotion Of Green Industry For Green Growth”. United Nations: Bangkok.
[23] (GTP, 2010): Growth and Transformation plan of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[24] (UNIDO, 20011&Kombolecha municipal, 2014): Green Industry: Policies for Supporting Green Industry: Vienna. Accessed: Www.Unidio.Org/Green Industry.
[25] WBCSD 1996: Eco Efficiency And Cleaner Production: Charting the Course to Sustainability. Geneva: Switzerland.
[26] Isabell S and Manfred M; Peter S and Andreas K, Wolfgang R and Carl-Otto G (2002): Managing Sustainability of Products and Processes with Socio-Eco-Efficiency Analysis. By BASF ÖkoInstitut in Freiburg: Germany.
[27] ESCAP 2009: Eco-Efficiency Indicators: Measuring Resource-Use Efficiency and the Impact of Economic Activities on UNEP. Bangkok 10200: Thailand Accessed At Www.Unescap.Org/Esd.
[28] Bruce W. S and Pter Saling, 2010: Measuring and Communicating Business through Eco Efficiency Analysis: Issue of CEP Environmental Management. BZAF, Chemical Company. USA. Www.Aiche.Org/Cep.
[29] Lorenzo (2013): Lorenzo C 2013: Finding a Green Nudge: Moral Motivation and Green Behaviour Working Paper Last Revision. Paris School Of Economics, Panthéon-Sorbonne: France.
[30] (Fussler, 1996): Fussler C 1996: Driving Eco Innovation. Pitman Publishing.
[31] (MDG, 2015): FDRE Milliunium development Goals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[32] Kombolecha mayor office, 2016: industry Growth and city development promotion report, Kombolecha, Ethiopia.
[33] ESCAP (2009a): Economic And Social Survey Of Asia And The Pacific: Addressing Triple Threats To Development. United Nations: Bangkok.
[34] UNEP (2009) and UNIDO (2011): Green Industry: Policies For Supporting Green Industry: Vienna. Www.Unidio.Org/Green Industry.
[35] FDRE, 2010: Ethiopia Growth and Transformation Plan Two (GTP-2). Addis Ababa: Ethiopia.
[36] FDRE, 2012: Ethiopia’s Climate-Resilient Green Economy: Green Economy Strategy. Addis Ababa: Ethiopia.
[37] FDRE, 2010: FDRE Industry Development Strategies, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[38] FDRE, 2010: FDRE Product Quality Assurance and Measurement Agency manuals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[39] Williams and Dair, 2005: Waste management. Environmental Sciences: A global concern. McGraw-Hill publisher, New York. 2005; 3-44.
[40] Tefera E, 2018, development of resource model for greening environmental resilience: an application of socio-eco efficiency framework in Kombolecha industrial zone. PhD thesis, college of Agriculture and environmental science, University of South Africa. South Africa.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Tefera Eshete Kebede, Chipo Mukonza, Munyaradzi Chitakira. (2020). Socio-Eco-efficiency Indictors Effect on Water Consumption and Recycling Efficiency in Kombolecha, Ethiopia. International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, 4(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Tefera Eshete Kebede; Chipo Mukonza; Munyaradzi Chitakira. Socio-Eco-efficiency Indictors Effect on Water Consumption and Recycling Efficiency in Kombolecha, Ethiopia. Int. J. Atmos. Oceanic Sci. 2020, 4(1), 7-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Tefera Eshete Kebede, Chipo Mukonza, Munyaradzi Chitakira. Socio-Eco-efficiency Indictors Effect on Water Consumption and Recycling Efficiency in Kombolecha, Ethiopia. Int J Atmos Oceanic Sci. 2020;4(1):7-19. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12,
      author = {Tefera Eshete Kebede and Chipo Mukonza and Munyaradzi Chitakira},
      title = {Socio-Eco-efficiency Indictors Effect on Water Consumption and Recycling Efficiency in Kombolecha, Ethiopia},
      journal = {International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences},
      volume = {4},
      number = {1},
      pages = {7-19},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaos.20200401.12},
      abstract = {Ethiopia is amongst agrarian economy but drought affected and rainfall dependent country in eastern Africa. Water consumption growth and green environmental problems were increasing parallel to factories production growth and population density rise in Kombolecha city. Consumers were used water resources for different purposes to attain their optimal social, economic and environmental aspects. However, consumer’s economic, social, and environmental indicators were disintegrated in the course of water consumption and recycling process. This study intended to determine the effect of socio-coefficient indicators on water consumption and recycling efficiency in Kombolecha. In doing so, this study employed instrumental variable model and two stages least square estimation that could be integrated the consumer’s social, economic and environmental indicators and built a socio-eco efficiency framework, which maintain water consumption and recycling efficiency in drought affected cities. In addition to this, propensity score matching estimation was used to evaluate the impacts of consumer’s poverty and consumption behaviours effect on water consumption and recycling efficiency. Accordingly, this study investigated that consumer’s water consumption behaviours were found different and varied across their production and consumption purposes in Kombolecha. For instance, factories were used different quantities of water along with their type of production. It was also computed that consumer’s social, economic and environmental aspects were associated with their water consumption and recycling processes. However, household’s consumption behavior and poverty level was negatively associated and affected the water consumption and recycling efficiency at the 5 percent significance level. In this study, nonetheless, rather than each separate indicator, the socio- eco efficiency framework, which consisted the three key indicators, were positively and statistically significant and influenced consumer’s water consumption and recycling efficiency in meeting green environment resilience. This study, thus, recommends that environment protection offices should be tactically integrated consumer’s social, economic and environmental indicators to build socio- eco efficiency that recover the green environment Kombolecha and at large in Ethiopia.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Socio-Eco-efficiency Indictors Effect on Water Consumption and Recycling Efficiency in Kombolecha, Ethiopia
    AU  - Tefera Eshete Kebede
    AU  - Chipo Mukonza
    AU  - Munyaradzi Chitakira
    Y1  - 2020/01/09
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12
    T2  - International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences
    SP  - 7
    EP  - 19
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1150
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaos.20200401.12
    AB  - Ethiopia is amongst agrarian economy but drought affected and rainfall dependent country in eastern Africa. Water consumption growth and green environmental problems were increasing parallel to factories production growth and population density rise in Kombolecha city. Consumers were used water resources for different purposes to attain their optimal social, economic and environmental aspects. However, consumer’s economic, social, and environmental indicators were disintegrated in the course of water consumption and recycling process. This study intended to determine the effect of socio-coefficient indicators on water consumption and recycling efficiency in Kombolecha. In doing so, this study employed instrumental variable model and two stages least square estimation that could be integrated the consumer’s social, economic and environmental indicators and built a socio-eco efficiency framework, which maintain water consumption and recycling efficiency in drought affected cities. In addition to this, propensity score matching estimation was used to evaluate the impacts of consumer’s poverty and consumption behaviours effect on water consumption and recycling efficiency. Accordingly, this study investigated that consumer’s water consumption behaviours were found different and varied across their production and consumption purposes in Kombolecha. For instance, factories were used different quantities of water along with their type of production. It was also computed that consumer’s social, economic and environmental aspects were associated with their water consumption and recycling processes. However, household’s consumption behavior and poverty level was negatively associated and affected the water consumption and recycling efficiency at the 5 percent significance level. In this study, nonetheless, rather than each separate indicator, the socio- eco efficiency framework, which consisted the three key indicators, were positively and statistically significant and influenced consumer’s water consumption and recycling efficiency in meeting green environment resilience. This study, thus, recommends that environment protection offices should be tactically integrated consumer’s social, economic and environmental indicators to build socio- eco efficiency that recover the green environment Kombolecha and at large in Ethiopia.
    VL  - 4
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Economics, Business and Economics College, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • School of Ecology and Human Sustainability, Department of Environmental Science, University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Calabash Building, South Africa

  • School of Ecology and Human Sustainability, Department of Environmental Science, University of South Africa, Florida Campus, Calabash Building, South Africa

  • Sections